Developing and formalising contractual arrangements in the procurement context is crucial for several reasons:
- Clear expectations: A well-drafted contract outlines the responsibilities and expectations of both parties involved in the procurement process. This clarity can help avoid misunderstandings or disagreements later on.
- Legal protection: A contract provides legal protection to both the buyer and the supplier. If there is a dispute, the contract serves as evidence of the agreement and the legal obligations of each party.
- Risk management: A contract can help manage risk by outlining the steps to be taken if a problem arises, such as product defects or delivery delays. A well-drafted contract can also specify how disputes will be resolved, which can help avoid costly litigation.
- Compliance: Formalized contractual arrangements ensure that both parties comply with applicable laws and regulations, such as those related to environmental protection or labour practices.
- Performance management: Contracts can also help manage supplier performance by setting clear standards for quality, delivery times, and other factors. This helps ensure that the buyer receives what they have paid for and can take action if the supplier fails to meet their obligations
Developing and formalising contractual arrangements involves several steps, including obtaining approvals, negotiating contract wording, structuring the contract to address identified risks and protect both parties and ensuring that the contract is legally binding
The methods used to obtain approvals to enter negotiations and negotiate the final wording of a contract may vary depending on the organisation and the specific procurement process. However, here are some general methods that may be used:
- Written proposals: Written proposals can be submitted to relevant stakeholders outlining the objectives and potential benefits of the procurement process. This can help to obtain initial approvals and set the stage for negotiations
- Meetings and presentations: Meetings and presentations can be arranged to discuss the proposed procurement process with relevant stakeholders. This can help to address any questions or concerns and obtain buy-in from all parties involved
- Legal review: Legal review can be conducted to ensure that the proposed procurement process and contract are in compliance with relevant laws and regulations. This can help to obtain approval from legal counsel and mitigate any legal risks.
- Budget review: Budget review can be conducted to ensure that the proposed procurement process is in line with available resources and funding. This can help to obtain approval from finance and other relevant departments.
In terms of who should be involved in obtaining approvals, it is typically the responsibility of the project manager or procurement officer to initiate and manage the procurement process. They may need to obtain approvals from senior management, legal counsel, finance, and other relevant departments, depending on the specific procurement process and organisation.
Ultimately, the goal is to obtain approvals from all relevant stakeholders to ensure that the procurement process is carried out effectively and that the resulting contract meets the needs of all parties involved.
How to negotiate the final wording of contract
Negotiating contracts can be a complex process that requires careful planning and execution. Here are some techniques that can be used to help negotiate contracts:
Before entering into contract negotiations, it is important to prepare thoroughly. This may involve researching the other party, gathering relevant information and data, and identifying your own goals and objectives
Rather than getting caught up in specific positions, it is often more productive to focus on underlying interests. This means understanding the needs and motivations of all parties involved and working to find a mutually beneficial solution.
Active listening is an essential component of effective negotiation. It involves paying close attention to what the other party is saying, asking clarifying questions, and demonstrating empathy and understanding.
Building positive relationships with the other party can help to facilitate the negotiation process. This may involve finding common ground, acknowledging shared interests, and demonstrating a willingness to work together
Sometimes, creative thinking is required to find a solution that meets the needs of all parties involved. This may involve thinking outside the box, exploring new ideas, and being open to alternative solutions
Negotiations often involve some degree of compromise. It is important to remain flexible and open to making concessions in order to reach a mutually beneficial agreement
When negotiating, it can be helpful to use objective criteria to guide the discussion. This may involve referring to industry standards, market data, or other relevant benchmarks
If a satisfactory agreement cannot be reached, it may be necessary to consider alternatives. This may involve exploring other suppliers or solutions, or re-evaluating the goals and objectives of the negotiation
By using these techniques, negotiators can work to ensure that contracts are fair, reasonable, and beneficial for all parties involved.
What might be negotiated?
Here are some examples of what might be negotiated during the final wording of contracts:
- Payment terms: The payment terms may be negotiated to ensure that they are acceptable to both parties. For example, the payment schedule may be adjusted to provide for more frequent payments or to allow for partial payments.
- Delivery schedules: The delivery schedule may be negotiated to ensure that it is realistic and achievable. For example, the delivery dates may be extended to provide more time for production or transportation.
- Warranties: The warranty terms may be negotiated to ensure that they are fair and reasonable. For example, the length of the warranty period may be extended or the types of defects covered may be expanded.
- Force majeure clauses: The force majeure clauses may be negotiated to ensure that they are clear and comprehensive. For example, the specific events that qualify as force majeure may be defined in more detail.
- Termination clauses: The termination clauses may be negotiated to ensure that they are fair and reasonable. For example, the notice period required to terminate the agreement may be extended or reduced depending on the needs of the parties involved.
Obtaining approvals to enter into contracts is a critical step in the procurement process for several reasons:
In many organisations, entering into contracts may require the approval of specific individuals or departments. Obtaining these approvals helps to ensure that the organisation is complying with relevant laws, regulations, and internal policies and procedures.
Contracts can introduce risks to an organisation, such as financial risks, legal risks, or reputational risks. By requiring approvals to enter into contracts, organisations can ensure that risks are appropriately assessed and managed.
Contracts establish the roles and responsibilities of all parties involved in the procurement process. By obtaining approvals, organisations can ensure that all parties understand their roles and responsibilities and agree to the terms outlined in the contract.
Contracts establish a framework for holding all parties accountable for their actions and responsibilities. By obtaining approvals, organisations can ensure that all parties are aware of the consequences of not meeting their obligations under the contract.
Approvals to enter into contracts typically involve a review and analysis of the proposed contract. This review can help to ensure that the contract is aligned with the organisation’s goals and objectives and that it represents a sound business decision.
Overall, obtaining approvals to enter into contracts is essential to the success of the procurement process. By requiring approvals, organisations can ensure legal compliance, manage risks, clarify responsibilities, ensure accountability, and support effective decision-making.
Signatures
Ensuring that contracts are signed by all parties before contracted work commences is crucial for the success of the procurement process. A signed contract is legally binding and provides a clear understanding of the expectations of all parties involved. It helps to manage risks associated with the procurement process, as well as hold all parties accountable for their roles and responsibilities. By having a signed contract, organisations can avoid misunderstandings and disputes that may arise when expectations are not clearly communicated and agreed upon. Additionally, signed contracts help to ensure legal compliance and protect the interests of all parties involved. Overall, ensuring that contracts are signed before contracted work commences is an important step in the procurement process that helps to ensure its success.
Structuring contracts is an essential step in the procurement process that involves capturing and addressing identified risks, protecting both parties, providing a basis for due performance, and outlining expected standards of behaviour. Here are some steps to structure contracts:
- Identify Risks: The first step in structuring contracts is to identify potential risks associated with the procurement process. Risks may include financial, legal, or reputational risks, among others. For example, if the procurement involves the acquisition of specialised equipment, there may be a risk that the equipment does not meet the required specifications, resulting in financial losses and delays.
- Address Risks: Once risks have been identified, the contract should be structured to address them. For example, the contract may include provisions for testing and acceptance of the equipment to ensure that it meets the required specifications. The contract may also include penalties or remedies if the equipment fails to meet the specified requirements.
- Protect Both Parties: The contract should be structured to protect the interests of both parties involved in the procurement process. For example, the contract may include provisions for confidentiality, intellectual property, and liability. Both parties should have a clear understanding of their rights and obligations under the contract.
- Provide a Basis for Due Performance: The contract should provide a clear basis for due performance. This includes specifying the scope of work, timelines, and deliverables. For example, the contract may include milestones and payment schedules to ensure that the work is completed on time and to the required standards.
- Outline Expected Standards of Behaviour: The contract should outline expected standards of behaviour for all parties involved in the procurement process. This includes ethical standards, health and safety requirements, and other relevant policies and procedures. For example, the contract may require compliance with specific regulations and standards, such as environmental regulations.
In summary, structuring contracts involves identifying and addressing risks, protecting both parties, providing a basis for due performance, and outlining expected standards of behaviour. By following these steps, organisations can ensure that contracts are clear and effective and provide a solid foundation for the procurement process.
Ensuring that contracts are valid and legally binding is crucial to the success of the procurement process. Here are some steps to ensure that contracts are valid and legally binding to the parties:
The first step in ensuring that contracts are valid and legally binding is to review relevant laws and regulations. This includes contract law, procurement regulations, and any other applicable legal requirements. It is important to ensure that the contract complies with all relevant legal requirements to ensure its validity.
Contracts should use clear and precise language to ensure that all parties involved understand the terms and conditions of the contract. Unclear or ambiguous language can lead to misunderstandings and disputes, which can affect the validity of the contract.
Contracts should include all essential elements, such as the names of the parties involved, the scope of work, timelines, deliverables, and payment terms. All essential elements should be clearly stated in the contract to ensure its validity.
All parties involved in the procurement process must mutually agree to the terms and conditions of the contract. This means that all parties should sign the contract and acknowledge their acceptance of its terms and conditions. This is critical to ensuring that the contract is legally binding
It may be helpful to consult with legal experts, such as lawyers or contract specialists, to ensure that the contract is valid and legally binding. Legal experts can review the contract and provide guidance on how to ensure that it complies with all relevant legal requirements.
Example
An example of a situation where a contract was not valid and legally binding is the case of Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. (1965) in the United States. In this case, Ms. Williams had entered into a contract with Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. to purchase several items in instalment payments. The contract included a "cross-collateral" clause, which meant that all of the items purchased on credit were used as security for each other. This clause was buried in the fine print of the contract, and Ms. Williams did not fully understand its implications.
Ms. Williams eventually fell behind on her payments, and Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. repossessed all of the items purchased, including those that had already been fully paid for. Ms. Williams sued, arguing that the "cross-collateral" clause was unconscionable and that the contract was not valid and legally binding.
The court found in favour of Ms. Williams, ruling that the "cross-collateral" clause was unconscionable and that the contract was not valid and legally binding. The court held that the clause was hidden in the fine print and that Ms. Williams had not been fully informed of its implications. As a result, the court found that the contract was not entered into voluntarily and was, therefore, unenforceable.
This case highlights the importance of ensuring that contracts are not only legally binding but also fair and equitable. Contracts should be written in clear and concise language, with all essential terms and conditions disclosed upfront. Any clauses that are hidden in fine print or are otherwise difficult to understand can render the contract invalid and unenforceable, as was the case in Williams v. Walker - Thomas Furniture Co.
Quiz
